1. The sick person is to call the elders. 1t is primarily the decision of the
sick person to ask for this ministry.
2. The elders are to pray. This is not some extraordinary healing
ministry, but one which is entrusted to the day-to-day leaders in the local
church. There is no call to fly to the Philippines in search of some faith
healer.
3. The elders are to anoint the sick person with oil. Some commentators
regard the oil as medicinal. It was used in the parable of the Good
Samaritan (see Luke 10:34), and the second-century physician Galen
recommended oil as 'the best of all remedies for paralysis'. Some
therefore believe that James was saying that the sick person should be
treated with all available spiritual and scientific resources. That is a
sensible procedure, but it seems to me that the oil is probably used as a
kind of 'visible word'. This is not the Roman Catholic sacrament of
extreme unction because the sick person is expected to recover, not to
die. Anointing with oil symbolizes consecration to God.
4. The emphasis is on prayer and forgiveness of sins, not oil and
physical healing. There is no promise in Scripture that God must heal us
if we pray to Him. Paul prayed in faith three times that his thorn in the
flesh would be removed, but the Lord refused his prayer (2 Cor. 12:7-
10). But God must hear the prayer of faith for forgiveness. We are to
pray for healing, and believe that God is all-powerful and able to heal.
But to conclude that He is committed to healing in every case is to go
beyond the promises of Scripture.
All in all, this passage in James has been much neglected in some circles and much misunderstood in others. I am not sure that I have too much to contribute to the discussion. But it seems to me that in times of sickness, anointing with oil by the eiders is a practice that is quite biblical and one we should be resurrecting.